Trip to London

Oral presentation

Presentation

I used a Powerpoint with images which were related to the topic and the time was correct too. So I put a 10/10.

Body language and eye contact.

I looked at the audience the majority of the time except some times when I looked my papers to know where I was, but I didn't read from the notes. So that will be a 8/10.

Structure

I introduced the topic, the ideas were well organized and it was well structured. So that's a 10/10.

Content

I think that most of the information was new for the audience and that the message was clear so people could understand. So it will be a 37/40.

Language

The grammar wasn't so complex but the vocabulary was varied. I used some connectors and fillers. So it's a 17/20.

Pronunciation and entonation

The pronunciation surely wasn't the best but I think it was comprehensible and the tone of voice changed during the presentation So that part will be a 7/10.

Total: 89/100

Oral presentation: Apple vs Microsoft

Presentation

We used a Powerpoint with images and a video which were related to the topic so I think that in this part we didn't fail. Although we were three and the oral presentation lasted 10 minutes so we should do a bit longer. So I put a 9/10.

Body language and eye contact.

I looked at the audience the majority of the time except a moment when I was lost and I read from the notes. I was standing all the time in the same place and with the hands in my back to make sure I didn't look to the notes. So that will be a 6/10.

Structure

We introduced the topic and we asked some questions. I think that the ideas were well organized we used some discourse markers and we did a conclusion about what we think of the topic. So that's a 10/10.

Content

I think that most of the information was new for the audience, information wasn't so extensed but it was the necessary. Our opinions in the conclusion were justified and we show some examples with images and the video. I think the message was clear and people could understand. So it will be a 35/40.

Language

The grammar wasn't so complex but the vocabulary was varied. We used some connectors and fillers. So it's a 15/20.

Pronunciation and entonation

The pronunciation surely wasnt the best but I think it was comprehensible. The tone of voice changed during the presentation but there were some interruptions when I losed the world and didn't know where we were. So that part will be a 8/10.

Total: 83/100